Two leaders walked into the same wall.
Different industries. Different team sizes. Different problems on the surface. Maria Rodriguez was running a $8M digital marketing agency, drowning in client work she couldn’t stop inserting herself into. David Chen was running a 180-person manufacturing operation, personally filling every gap his team couldn’t cover.
Same wall.
The leadership behavior that had built their success had quietly become the thing blocking their next level of growth. And the maddening part? Both of them were being praised for it. Clients loved Maria’s hands-on commitment. David’s employees respected his work ethic and willingness to roll up his sleeves. Their teams leaned on these qualities daily.
Which is exactly what made the pattern so hard to see.
The Model That Built Your Business
There’s a leadership style I see constantly in business owners and executives who’ve grown something real from the ground up. I call it the Muscle Model, though you might also hear it called the Superhero Model.
It looks like this: when something needs doing, the leader does it. When something goes wrong, the leader fixes it. When a client is unhappy, the leader gets on the call. When a key person leaves, the leader covers the gap. When the strategy needs sharpening, the leader sharpens it, usually at 11 p.m. on a Sunday.
This model works brilliantly in the early phases of a business. In fact, it’s often the only thing that works. When you’re building from scratch, when every client matters and every mistake is expensive and there’s no system yet to catch things that fall through the cracks, the leader’s personal muscle is the business. That’s not a flaw. That’s just the reality of early growth.
The problem is what happens next.
The business grows. The team grows. The complexity grows. And the leader keeps doing the same thing, because it worked before and because frankly, no one has told them to stop. So the Muscle Model expands. Which means instead of one person covering gaps for a 12-person team, that same person is now covering gaps for 30 people. Or 100. Or doing it across a client portfolio three times the size it used to be.
The effort multiplies. The returns don’t.
When Strength Becomes the Ceiling
Here’s the painful irony that both Maria and David had to reckon with: the leadership behaviors that earned them the most praise were the exact behaviors creating their plateau.
Maria’s clients loved her because she was always available, always sharp, always personally invested in their outcomes. That devotion built the agency. It also meant that at year nine, with a full team of capable people, she was still the one pulling all-nighters because the system had been built around her presence, not around its own capability.
David’s employees respected him because he never asked anyone to do something he wasn’t willing to do himself. He knew the floor. He knew the machines. He knew the clients. That credibility built the culture. It also meant that by the time the company had 180 people, no one had truly been developed to lead, because David had always been there to catch everything before it hit the ground.
Neither of them had a talent problem or a strategy problem, at least not primarily.
They had a leadership model problem. One that was rational, understandable, and deeply embedded in the identity they’d built as leaders.
What got them here was genuinely not going to get them there.
The Shift: From Muscle to Facilitation
Facilitative leadership looks different from what many executives are used to. It’s not about doing less. It’s not about stepping back and hoping the team figures it out. It’s about doing the right things at the right level, specifically the things that compound rather than close loops.
The muscle leader puts ‘points on the scoreboard.’ The facilitative leader also scores points, but he/she does it without touching the ball! That’s the difference; that’s how to scale your impact.
Maria’s version of this shift was creating integrated planning sessions, where growth strategy, talent needs, and leadership adjustments were addressed together as one conversation rather than three separate responsibilities she managed alone. She stopped being the answer to every problem and started building the conditions where her team could find the answers themselves.
David’s version was learning to see his talent clearly and then deploying it deliberately. He stopped treating every gap as a personal responsibility and started asking who on his team was positioned to own specific challenges. His floor supervisor took planning/scheduling systems. His engineer led complex proposals. David’s job became connecting talent to problems, not solving every problem himself.
Both shifts felt uncomfortable at first. Letting go always does, especially when you’ve been rewarded for holding on.
But here’s what both of them found on the other side: more movement, with less personal force. Not because the business got easier, but because the leadership finally matched what the business actually needed.
The Question That Changes Everything
There’s a deeper layer to this, and it’s the one most leaders miss entirely.
You can recognize the Muscle Model in yourself. You can commit to building better systems, delegating more thoughtfully, and developing your team. All of that is real and necessary work.
But there’s a question that has to come before all of it, one that determines whether the leadership adjustments you make will actually gain traction:
Where is your business right now on its growth journey?
This matters more than most leaders realize, because the right leadership approach depends entirely on the answer. The behaviors that serve a business in Early Growth look nothing like what’s required in Mature Growth. Both look completely different from what a business at Pinnacle actually needs. And if you’re already sliding into decline, some of the very behaviors that worked in Mature Growth are now accelerating the problem.
Facilitative leadership isn’t a universal prescription. It’s the right medicine for a specific set of circumstances. Without knowing your position, you’re adjusting your approach with no map to guide you.
Maria and David both eventually got clear on where their businesses sat on the growth curve. That clarity didn’t just inform how they led. It validated why the shifts they were making were the right ones, and gave them the confidence to keep going when the change felt uncomfortable.
You can’t lead the business forward if you don’t know where forward actually is.
Three Questions Worth Asking This Week
If any of this landed, here’s where to start:
- Where does your effort go on a typical week? Write it down. Be honest. How much of it is you closing loops that a capable team member could and should be closing?
- Is your leadership model built around your presence, or around a system that works without it? The difference shows up most clearly when you’re unavailable. What happens then?
- What would change in your business if you spent 30% more of your time building the conditions for your team to succeed, rather than succeeding on their behalf?
These aren’t abstract questions. They’re diagnostic. And the answers will tell you more about your current growth ceiling than any revenue report.
Coming Soon
For the last three weeks, we’ve been circling the same core challenge from different angles: the integration problem, the talent clarity problem, and now the leadership model problem. What’s becoming clear is that all three share a single upstream cause.
Next week, I’m going to pull that thread all the way through, and I’ll also be sharing something new that makes this kind of clarity a lot more accessible than it used to be. Stay tuned.
The leadership evolution framework, including how to identify your default model and what the shift to facilitative leadership actually requires, is laid out in full in Talent-Driven Growth.
Be sure to follow on LinkedIn and subscribe to my newsletter for more!
Next week: All three problems we’ve explored this month share the same root cause. Once you see it, the path forward gets a lot clearer.
